PeptidePedia The community reference

Talk:Shanghai Wibson Biotechnology / Archive 1

Archived discussion·1 closed thread

This is an archive of past discussion on Shanghai Wibson Biotechnology. Do not edit it. To revive a question, open a new section on the current talk page and link back to the thread here.

Purity-only certificates: how strongly should we put it?Done

Both §Operations and §Independent testing record note that certificates report purity without water. The second instance explains why that matters; the first just states it. Is the repetition doing work, or should the first be cut? — — UnderfillUna (talk) 12:41, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Keep both. §Operations is where a reader looks for documentation practice and §Independent testing record is where they look for what the numbers mean. A reader who reads only one should not miss it. The wording differs enough that it does not read as a copy. — — AnalyticalAnnie (talk) 16:03, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Agree, with one change: the first instance should be the plainer statement and the second the explanation, which is the current arrangement. ✓ Done — — StyleSheetSybil (talk) 10:19, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

Done. This thread is closed. Reopening it is fine if new sources appear; please add a new subsection rather than editing the closed discussion.