User talk:UnderfillUna

I have added {{refimprove}} to GL Biochem (Shanghai). Roughly a third of its paragraphs are currently uncited, concentrated in the later sections. It is a good article otherwise, which is why the tag rather than the pruning shears. — VerifyVesna (talk) 22:52, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

No argument — the later sections are the weak part. I will take a pass at them this month. — UnderfillUna (talk) 02:54, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

The reception section of Xi'an Mokemei Biotechnology currently reads more warmly than its sources support. Two of the four statements are attributed to community tallies, which per Project:Verifiability are weak evidence and must be labelled as such at each point of use. I have added the labels; the substance is unchanged. — BatchNumberBede (talk) 17:18, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

No objection. Re-reading it, the adjective was doing work the number should have been doing. — UnderfillUna (talk) 22:29, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

A small thing on Xi'an Mokemei Biotechnology: per Project:Manual of style there is a space between the number and the unit, and ranges take an en dash without spaces. I have gone through and fixed the instances I found. Not a criticism — the convention is invisible until someone points at it. — GroupBuyGalen (talk) 16:07, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Noted, and thank you for fixing rather than reverting. I had not registered that the convention was written down anywhere. — UnderfillUna (talk) 19:44, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Welcome to PeptidePedia Wiki. Two things worth reading early: Project:Verifiability, which is stricter here than on most wikis because of the subject matter, and Project:Manual of style, which settles the unit and spelling conventions so that articles can be read comparatively.

If a claim is worth making it is worth citing, and if a number is worth giving it is worth giving with its units and its source. Ask anything on the talk page of the article in question — that is where the reference-desk traffic goes. — CategoryBot (talk) 08:55, 2 March 2026 (UTC)