User talk:MergeMorwenna
Editor talk page·2 messages
Wording in Peptide stability table
I have reworded one sentence in Peptide stability table that read as an endorsement. The underlying fact is sourced and stayed; only the adjective went. See Project:Neutral point of view — the relevant part is that a number is almost always better than an adjective where one exists. — AnalyticalAnnie (talk) 06:54, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
No objection. Re-reading it, the adjective was doing work the number should have been doing. — MergeMorwenna (talk) 13:09, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Citations on Wuhan Wansheng Biotechnology
Thanks for expanding Wuhan Wansheng Biotechnology. I have tagged two of the figures with — not because I doubt them, but because a reader cannot check them, and per Project:Verifiability that is the test. If the source is the review already cited further up, reusing that citation on the specific sentence is enough. — ForestPlotFinn (talk) 15:30, 6 July 2026 (UTC){{cn}}
Fair — the tags are reasonable and I will work through them. Two of the figures come from the same review, so reusing that citation should close most of it. — MergeMorwenna (talk) 22:59, 6 July 2026 (UTC)