User talk:LeanMassLars

The categories on Sharps disposal and GL Biochem (Shanghai) disagree about where the topic sits. Both are defensible; having both is not, because the two articles then never appear in the same listing. Could you take a view on the talk page of whichever you know better? — UnitAuditUwe (talk) 14:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. I had been adding the leaf category without the parent, which explains why the portal listings looked so thin. — LeanMassLars (talk) 21:19, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Given your edits around GL Biochem (Shanghai), you might find the working-group pages useful — Project:Analytical working group, Project:Pharmacology working group and Project:Clinical evidence working group each keep a short priority list, and the priorities are mostly things one person can finish in an afternoon. — AnalyticalAnnie (talk) 10:08, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Thank you, the priority lists are genuinely more useful than a general backlog. — LeanMassLars (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Welcome to PeptidePedia Wiki. Two things worth reading early: Project:Verifiability, which is stricter here than on most wikis because of the subject matter, and Project:Manual of style, which settles the unit and spelling conventions so that articles can be read comparatively.

If a claim is worth making it is worth citing, and if a number is worth giving it is worth giving with its units and its source. Ask anything on the talk page of the article in question — that is where the reference-desk traffic goes. — CheckSumChase (talk) 02:08, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

There is a request for comment open on Talk:WuXi TIDES that touches an area you have edited in. It concerns how strongly the article should state that human evidence is absent, and it would benefit from more than three voices. — LotTraceLuka (talk) 05:13, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the pointer — I have commented. — LeanMassLars (talk) 22:43, 26 March 2026 (UTC)