User talk:DiffWatchDov
Editor talk page·2 messages
Lead of Sharps disposal
The lead of Sharps disposal has grown to five paragraphs and now contains material that appears nowhere in the body. Per Project:Manual of style the lead summarises the article rather than extending it. Rather than cut it myself I thought I would ask whether the extra material was meant to become a section. — MicrodoseMagnus (talk) 15:04, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Noted, and thank you for fixing rather than reverting. I had not registered that the convention was written down anywhere. — DiffWatchDov (talk) 22:07, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Wording in Shanghai Wibson Biotechnology
I have reworded one sentence in Shanghai Wibson Biotechnology that read as an endorsement. The underlying fact is sourced and stayed; only the adjective went. See Project:Neutral point of view — the relevant part is that a number is almost always better than an adjective where one exists. — OralSemaOswin (talk) 09:58, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
No objection. Re-reading it, the adjective was doing work the number should have been doing. — DiffWatchDov (talk) 18:35, 3 July 2026 (UTC)