PeptidePedia The community reference

User talk:GastroparesisGwen

Editor talk page·5 messages

This is the talk page for the editor GastroparesisGwen. Messages left here are public and are signed. Please add new messages at the bottom, and sign with four tildes.

Talk page archived

Threads on this page older than 120 days and marked resolved have been moved to an archive subpage. Unresolved threads were left in place regardless of age. This is an automated message. — CiteBot (talk) 16:00, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Categorisation of Nantong Guangyuan Chemical

Nantong Guangyuan Chemical was in Category:Peptide suppliers but not in its parent chain, so it was invisible from the topic portal. I have fixed it. If you are adding categories in bulk, Special:WantedPages lists the ones that are currently claimed by articles but have no page. — BlindSampleBrid (talk) 23:07, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. I had been adding the leaf category without the parent, which explains why the portal listings looked so thin. — GastroparesisGwen (talk) 09:27, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Automated notice: citation formatting on Guangzhou JEEP Biotechnology

An automated pass normalised the citation formatting on Guangzhou JEEP Biotechnology and expanded two bare identifiers into full citations. One reference could not be resolved and has been left tagged. This is an automated message; replies to it are read by a human eventually, but the article talk page is faster. — ArchiveBot (talk) 17:15, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Neutrality of the reception section in Cold chain

The reception section of Cold chain currently reads more warmly than its sources support. Two of the four statements are attributed to community tallies, which per Project:Verifiability are weak evidence and must be labelled as such at each point of use. I have added the labels; the substance is unchanged. — Ref_Desk_Ron (talk) 06:02, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

No objection. Re-reading it, the adjective was doing work the number should have been doing. — GastroparesisGwen (talk) 11:28, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Units in Peptide stability table

A small thing on Peptide stability table: per Project:Manual of style there is a space between the number and the unit, and ranges take an en dash without spaces. I have gone through and fixed the instances I found. Not a criticism — the convention is invisible until someone points at it. — MarginNoteMars (talk) 08:36, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

Noted, and thank you for fixing rather than reverting. I had not registered that the convention was written down anywhere. — GastroparesisGwen (talk) 17:32, 4 July 2026 (UTC)