User talk:CrossRefCleve
Editor talk page·2 messages
Citations on Cold chain
Thanks for expanding Cold chain. I have tagged two of the figures with — not because I doubt them, but because a reader cannot check them, and per Project:Verifiability that is the test. If the source is the review already cited further up, reusing that citation on the specific sentence is enough. — LCellLeif (talk) 23:22, 2 February 2026 (UTC){{cn}}
Fair — the tags are reasonable and I will work through them. Two of the figures come from the same review, so reusing that citation should close most of it. — CrossRefCleve (talk) 15:44, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
Inference in Cold chain
The sentence you added to Cold chain draws a human conclusion from an animal study. That is the specific case Project:No original research is aimed at. Describing the study, its model and the absence of human data is both permitted and, I would argue, more informative than the inference. — DMF_Dermot (talk) 03:11, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
That is a fair reading of the policy. I have rewritten it to describe the study and to say plainly that no human data exists. — CrossRefCleve (talk) 15:42, 21 March 2026 (UTC)