User talk:ClinicCorrespondent
Editor talk page·2 messages
Working group invitation
Given your edits around Peptide stability table, you might find the working-group pages useful — Project:Analytical working group, Project:Pharmacology working group and Project:Clinical evidence working group each keep a short priority list, and the priorities are mostly things one person can finish in an afternoon. — NotabilityNoa (talk) 05:51, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Thank you, the priority lists are genuinely more useful than a general backlog. — ClinicCorrespondent (talk) 09:41, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
I think we disagree about Peptide stability table
We have now reverted each other twice on Peptide stability table, which is a sign that the disagreement is substantive rather than accidental. My reading is that the source supports the weaker of the two claims. Rather than continue in edit summaries, shall we put it on the article talk page and let someone else weigh in? — DiffWatchDov (talk) 01:56, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
Agreed, and I would rather be argued out of it than keep reverting. I have opened a section. — ClinicCorrespondent (talk) 04:18, 25 June 2026 (UTC)