User talk:TirzTaxonomist

Welcome to PeptidePedia Wiki. Two things worth reading early: Project:Verifiability, which is stricter here than on most wikis because of the subject matter, and Project:Manual of style, which settles the unit and spelling conventions so that articles can be read comparatively.

If a claim is worth making it is worth citing, and if a number is worth giving it is worth giving with its units and its source. Ask anything on the talk page of the article in question — that is where the reference-desk traffic goes. — DrTitration (talk) 12:05, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

An automated pass normalised the citation formatting on Cold chain and expanded two bare identifiers into full citations. One reference could not be resolved and has been left tagged. This is an automated message; replies to it are read by a human eventually, but the article talk page is faster. — CategoryBot (talk) 15:11, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

A small thing on Enteroendocrine L cell: per Project:Manual of style there is a space between the number and the unit, and ranges take an en dash without spaces. I have gone through and fixed the instances I found. Not a criticism — the convention is invisible until someone points at it. — SatietySunniva (talk) 15:29, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Noted, and thank you for fixing rather than reverting. I had not registered that the convention was written down anywhere. — TirzTaxonomist (talk) 19:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

The reception section of Cold chain currently reads more warmly than its sources support. Two of the four statements are attributed to community tallies, which per Project:Verifiability are weak evidence and must be labelled as such at each point of use. I have added the labels; the substance is unchanged. — CustomsClarke (talk) 22:44, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

No objection. Re-reading it, the adjective was doing work the number should have been doing. — TirzTaxonomist (talk) 01:52, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Your recent edits to Cold chain have consistently favoured one organisation, and one of them added promotional wording. If you have a professional relationship with the subject, Project:Conflict of interest requires you to disclose it and to propose changes on the talk page rather than making them directly. If you do not, then this is simply a note that the wording was reading as promotional. — CDMO_Caradoc (talk) 08:10, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

To be clear: I have no relationship with the subject. I take the point about the wording and have rephrased it. — TirzTaxonomist (talk) 19:26, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Beyond-use date was in Category:Preparation and handling but not in its parent chain, so it was invisible from the topic portal. I have fixed it. If you are adding categories in bulk, Special:WantedPages lists the ones that are currently claimed by articles but have no page. — LyophilLena (talk) 12:07, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. I had been adding the leaf category without the parent, which explains why the portal listings looked so thin. — TirzTaxonomist (talk) 22:08, 5 April 2026 (UTC)