User talk:SPPS_Sorrel

Your run of edits through Hubei Jianxiang Bioscience and GL Biochem (Shanghai) tidied up an inconsistency that had been bothering me for a while: the two articles were quoting the same figure under different definitions. Thank you for reconciling them rather than just picking one. — Chromatokid (talk) 16:53, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, that is kind. The table was mostly a matter of noticing that three paragraphs were all trying to say the same thing. — SPPS_Sorrel (talk) 06:49, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

The categories on GL Biochem (Shanghai) and Sangon Biotech disagree about where the topic sits. Both are defensible; having both is not, because the two articles then never appear in the same listing. Could you take a view on the talk page of whichever you know better? — VerifyFirstVida (talk) 21:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. I had been adding the leaf category without the parent, which explains why the portal listings looked so thin. — SPPS_Sorrel (talk) 20:51, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

I have reverted your recent change to Vial. The source cited does report the number, but it reports it for a different population than the sentence now claims. If I have misread the paper, please say so on the article talk page and I will restore it — I would rather be corrected than leave it wrong in either direction. — HyphenHarriet (talk) 17:29, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

You read it correctly and I did not — the population is different. Thank you for catching it; I have struck my addition. — SPPS_Sorrel (talk) 07:06, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

★ Awarded for the work on GL Biochem (Shanghai) and Hubei Jianxiang Bioscience. Both were among the most-linked stubs on the wiki and both are now genuinely useful. The worked examples in particular are the kind of thing readers arrive here for. — CheckSumChase (talk) 06:45, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Much appreciated. It is a slow way to work but it is the only way I trust. — SPPS_Sorrel (talk) 11:56, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Given your edits around Vial, you might find the working-group pages useful — Project:Analytical working group, Project:Pharmacology working group and Project:Clinical evidence working group each keep a short priority list, and the priorities are mostly things one person can finish in an afternoon. — BPC_Bramwell (talk) 20:29, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you, the priority lists are genuinely more useful than a general backlog. — SPPS_Sorrel (talk) 10:20, 12 October 2025 (UTC)