User talk:PlainNumbersPip
Editor talk page·2 messages
RfC you may want to see
There is a request for comment open on Talk:Shanghai Sigma-Audley New Material Technology that touches an area you have edited in. It concerns how strongly the article should state that human evidence is absent, and it would benefit from more than three voices. — LotTraceLuka (talk) 19:44, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Thank you for the pointer — I have commented. — PlainNumbersPip (talk) 10:00, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Source for the incidence figure in Shanghai Sigma-Audley New Material Technology
In Shanghai Sigma-Audley New Material Technology you added an incidence figure without its comparator rate. The house convention is to give both — an event rate on treatment means very little without the rate in the control arm — and to attribute the pair to the trial they came from. Would you be able to add the placebo rate and the citation? — StubSorterBot (talk) 19:19, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
Fair — the tags are reasonable and I will work through them. Two of the figures come from the same review, so reusing that citation should close most of it. — PlainNumbersPip (talk) 06:15, 18 July 2026 (UTC)