User talk:PancreasPru
Editor talk page·3 messages
The figure in Syringe dead space
The diagram you added to Syringe dead space is much clearer than the paragraph it replaced, and it is correctly labelled, which is rarer than it should be. If you have the patience for more of them, Special:WantedPages is not the right list but the portals each keep a "things you can do" box, and several ask for figures. — MicrodoseMagnus (talk) 12:32, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Thank you. I will look at the portal boxes. — PancreasPru (talk) 01:48, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
RfC you may want to see
There is a request for comment open on Talk:Nantong Guangyuan Chemical that touches an area you have edited in. It concerns how strongly the article should state that human evidence is absent, and it would benefit from more than three voices. — ColdChainCleo (talk) 17:59, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
Thank you for the pointer — I have commented. — PancreasPru (talk) 22:20, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
Your edit to Nantong Guangyuan Chemical
I have reverted your recent change to Nantong Guangyuan Chemical. The source cited does report the number, but it reports it for a different population than the sentence now claims. If I have misread the paper, please say so on the article talk page and I will restore it — I would rather be corrected than leave it wrong in either direction. — ChainCustodyChad (talk) 10:42, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
You read it correctly and I did not — the population is different. Thank you for catching it; I have struck my addition. — PancreasPru (talk) 11:45, 10 May 2026 (UTC)