User talk:OrforglipronOona

The categories on Shanghai ERP Biotechnology and Bachem Holding (Suzhou) disagree about where the topic sits. Both are defensible; having both is not, because the two articles then never appear in the same listing. Could you take a view on the talk page of whichever you know better? — Retention_Time_Rae (talk) 10:46, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. I had been adding the leaf category without the parent, which explains why the portal listings looked so thin. — OrforglipronOona (talk) 03:18, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

The {{cn}} tags on Shanghai ERP Biotechnology have all been addressed, so I have removed the article-level banner. Thank you for working through them — that backlog had been open since last autumn. — BlankVialBo (talk) 23:04, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

No argument — the later sections are the weak part. I will take a pass at them this month. — OrforglipronOona (talk) 12:25, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

I have reworded one sentence in Bachem Holding (Suzhou) that read as an endorsement. The underlying fact is sourced and stayed; only the adjective went. See Project:Neutral point of view — the relevant part is that a number is almost always better than an adjective where one exists. — LotTraceLuka (talk) 05:22, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

No objection. Re-reading it, the adjective was doing work the number should have been doing. — OrforglipronOona (talk) 09:55, 11 June 2026 (UTC)