User talk:DiluentDiya
Editor talk page·2 messages
Lead of Sangon Biotech
The lead of Sangon Biotech has grown to five paragraphs and now contains material that appears nowhere in the body. Per Project:Manual of style the lead summarises the article rather than extending it. Rather than cut it myself I thought I would ask whether the extra material was meant to become a section. — BatchNumberBede (talk) 19:56, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Noted, and thank you for fixing rather than reverting. I had not registered that the convention was written down anywhere. — DiluentDiya (talk) 16:17, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
Wording in Zhuhai Kerui Biotechnology
I have reworded one sentence in Zhuhai Kerui Biotechnology that read as an endorsement. The underlying fact is sourced and stayed; only the adjective went. See Project:Neutral point of view — the relevant part is that a number is almost always better than an adjective where one exists. — LeanMassLars (talk) 01:15, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
No objection. Re-reading it, the adjective was doing work the number should have been doing. — DiluentDiya (talk) 16:42, 13 November 2025 (UTC)