User talk:CaptionCzeslaw

In Wuhan Wansheng Biotechnology you added an incidence figure without its comparator rate. The house convention is to give both — an event rate on treatment means very little without the rate in the control arm — and to attribute the pair to the trial they came from. Would you be able to add the placebo rate and the citation? — ArchiveBot (talk) 20:41, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

Fair — the tags are reasonable and I will work through them. Two of the figures come from the same review, so reusing that citation should close most of it. — CaptionCzeslaw (talk) 06:07, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

I have reworded one sentence in Wuhan Wansheng Biotechnology that read as an endorsement. The underlying fact is sourced and stayed; only the adjective went. See Project:Neutral point of view — the relevant part is that a number is almost always better than an adjective where one exists. — GroupBuyGalen (talk) 07:10, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

No objection. Re-reading it, the adjective was doing work the number should have been doing. — CaptionCzeslaw (talk) 18:05, 9 June 2026 (UTC)