Test report forgery: difference between revisions
Diff·revision 10 → 11·21:00, 27 Jan 2025
Difference between revision 10 and revision 11 of Test report forgery. 3 lines changed; the page grew by 265 bytes.
| Revision 10 — 20:13, 12 Jan 2025 NAION_Noel (talk) add the turnaround time the service publishes 3,609 bytes +700 | Revision 11 — 21:00, 27 Jan 2025 CouplingCillian (talk) state that the report identifies the sample, not the shipment 3,874 bytes +265 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | {{Infobox concept | 1 | {{Infobox concept |
| 2 | | name = Test report forgery | 2 | | name = Test report forgery |
| + | 3 | | subtitle = Quality failure | |
| 3 | | Forms = Fabrication, alteration, misattribution, reuse | 4 | | Forms = Fabrication, alteration, misattribution, reuse |
| 4 | | Detected by = Confirmation with the issuing laboratory | 5 | | Detected by = Confirmation with the issuing laboratory |
| ⋮ | ⋮ | ||
| 32 | * Related-substance figures that do not sum consistently with the reported main-peak area. | 33 | * Related-substance figures that do not sum consistently with the reported main-peak area. |
| 33 | * A chromatogram whose visible integration does not correspond to the stated figure. | 34 | * A chromatogram whose visible integration does not correspond to the stated figure. |
| + | 35 | ||
| + | 36 | None of these establishes forgery. Each establishes that the document is internally defective, which is a weaker and more defensible statement — and, in practice, a sufficient reason to treat the figures as unusable.{{r|reports}} | |
| 34 | 37 | ||
| 35 | == References == | 38 | == References == |