Talk:PeptideMeter
Discussion page·3 threads·no archives
This is the discussion page for the article PeptideMeter. It is for improving the article: sources, wording, structure, scope and titles. It is not a general discussion forum about the subject, and it is not a place to ask for advice — see Project:Medical disclaimer.
Lower bound on variabilityResolved
"Read as a lower bound on variability rather than an estimate of central tendency" is the single most useful sentence about aggregate tallies I have seen on this wiki. Where did it come from? — TallySheetTad (talk) 10:15, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
It follows from the two filters: both truncate the tails, and truncated tails understate spread while doing unpredictable things to the middle. I have added a clause making the reasoning visible. ✓ Done — ForestPlotFinn (talk) 13:40, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
Should we import external tallies?Done
Proposal: import external tally figures into supplier articles for comparison. — SecondarySrc_Seb (talk) 09:50, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose. The populations differ and the comparison would imply a commensurability that does not exist. Citing with attribution is as far as we should go. — NPOV_Nadia (talk) 12:30, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
Withdrawn on those grounds. The distinction between citing and importing is the right line. ✓ Done — SecondarySrc_Seb (talk) 08:20, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
Small-sample rankings
The point about rankings driven by noise applies to a great deal of what circulates in this space. Should it be spun out into its own article? — DataTableDunja (talk) 11:30, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
Possibly, but not from three sentences. If it grows past a section it should move. — ScopeSeverin (talk) 15:10, 14 June 2026 (UTC)