Talk:Janoshik Analytical
Discussion page·3 threads·no archives
This is the discussion page for the article Janoshik Analytical. It is for improving the article: sources, wording, structure, scope and titles. It is not a general discussion forum about the subject, and it is not a place to ask for advice — see Project:Medical disclaimer.
Conflict of interest disclosureResolved
This organisation appears in the site's supporter notices. The article must therefore be held to a stricter neutrality standard than usual, and the talk banner should say so. — CoI_Corin (talk) 09:20, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
Banner added pointing at Project:Conflict of interest. The article as written describes documented practice and makes no comparative claim, which is the right posture. — DisclosureDido (talk) 12:45, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
Reviewed against the neutrality policy. No promotional language found. ✓ Done — NPOV_Nadia (talk) 09:05, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
Chromatogram-reading table
The table is a good idea but risks being read as a fault-finding checklist. The closing sentence guards against that; I would keep it immediately after the table rather than letting it drift. — Chromatokid (talk) 10:35, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Agreed. Peak asymmetry in particular has innocent explanations far more often than not, and the article should not teach readers to treat it as a red flag. — PeakShapePol (talk) 14:00, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Should content determination be described as an option?Done
The article says a content determination is not included unless separately commissioned. Is that generally true of analytical laboratories, or specific here? — ReportReaderRilla (talk) 11:15, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
Generally true — content is a separate determination requiring a different preparation. I have phrased it as a property of the determination rather than of the laboratory. ✓ Done — COA_Colwyn (talk) 15:20, 5 June 2026 (UTC)