Talk:Drug master file

Discussion page·2 threads·no archives

This is the discussion page for the article Drug master file. It is for improving the article: sources, wording, structure, scope and titles. It is not a general discussion forum about the subject, and it is not a place to ask for advice — see Project:Medical disclaimer.

A filing is not an approvalResolved

"Has a DMF" is used as though it meant regulatory approval. It means a document exists. The distinction should be unmissable. — DMF_Dermot (talk) 09:50, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

It is in the lead and again in the table. ✓ Done — Compounding_Cate (talk) 13:25, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Resolved. This thread is closed. Reopening it is fine if new sources appear; please add a new subsection rather than editing the closed discussion.

Same shape as other claimsDone

Grouping DMF, ISO 9001 and GMP claims as the same kind of thing — verifiable about an organisation, silent about a vial — is a useful generalisation. — VerifyVesna (talk) 10:20, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

And each article now states it in its own terms. ✓ Done — COA_Colwyn (talk) 13:55, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Done. This thread is closed. Reopening it is fine if new sources appear; please add a new subsection rather than editing the closed discussion.

This page was last edited on 12 June 2026, by COA_Colwyn. Text is available under the PeptidePedia Wiki Content Licence (PPCL-BY-SA 4.0).