ISO 9001: difference between revisions
Diff·revision 17 → 18·13:37, 28 Jun 2025
Difference between revision 17 and revision 18 of ISO 9001. 5 lines changed; the page grew by 519 bytes.
| Revision 17 — 01:36, 2 Jun 2025 CategoryBot (talk) bot: update parent category chain 3,379 bytes ±0 | Revision 18 — 13:37, 28 Jun 2025 AnalyticalAnnie (talk) add the note that this wiki does not give legal advice 3,898 bytes +519 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 33 | Accreditation of the certification body matters, since certificates are also issued by unaccredited bodies. An accredited certificate can be verified through the accreditation body's own register.{{r|reports}} | 33 | Accreditation of the certification body matters, since certificates are also issued by unaccredited bodies. An accredited certificate can be verified through the accreditation body's own register.{{r|reports}} |
| 34 | 34 | ||
| + | 35 | == What it implies about material == | |
| + | 36 | Indirectly, a functioning management system supports the documentary features this wiki treats as informative: lot-specific certificates, retrievable records, controlled changes, and consistency over time. See [[Lot traceability]].{{r|iso9001}} | |
| + | 37 | ||
| + | 38 | Directly, it implies nothing about any particular lot. A certified organisation can ship a defective lot, and an uncertified one can ship excellent material; certification bears on the probability of the former, not on the fact of it. | |
| + | 39 | ||
| 35 | == References == | 40 | == References == |
| 36 | {{reflist}} | 41 | {{reflist}} |