Test report forgery (revision 2)
Old revision·02:48, 12 Oct 2024·IcodecIndra
This is an old revision of this page, as it stood at 02:48, 12 Oct 2024, saved by IcodecIndra with the summary fix a dangling clause. It may differ substantially from the current revision, and any error it contains may since have been corrected.
| Test report forgery | |
|---|---|
| Forms | Fabrication, alteration, misattribution, reuse |
| Detected by | Confirmation with the issuing laboratory |
| Not detected by | Inspection of the document alone |
| Topic infobox · conventions | |
Test report forgery is the fabrication of an analytical report, or the alteration, misattribution or reuse of a genuine one. It is the reason a document cannot by itself establish anything about a material: a document is an assertion, and assertions can be manufactured as easily as the things they describe.[1]
Four distinct practices are usually grouped under the term. A wholly fabricated report describes work never done. An altered report changes figures on a genuine document. A misattributed report is a genuine report on other material presented as covering this one. A reused report is a genuine report on an old lot presented as current.[2]
References
- ^ PeptidePedia Wiki community test-report tally, 2024–2026 (self-reported; see Project:Sourcing guidelines).
- ^ United States Pharmacopeia, General Chapter <1503>, Quality Attributes of Synthetic Peptide Drug Substances.
Categories: