Test report forgery: difference between revisions
Diff·revision 5 → 6·23:17, 17 Nov 2024
Difference between revision 5 and revision 6 of Test report forgery. 2 lines changed; the page grew by 321 bytes.
| Revision 5 — 12:15, 8 Nov 2024 DeadSpaceDot (talk) expand §Internal signals 1,998 bytes ±0 | Revision 6 — 23:17, 17 Nov 2024 BaselineBex (talk) expand §Internal signals 2,319 bytes +321 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Four distinct practices are usually grouped under the term. A wholly fabricated report describes work never done. An altered report changes figures on a genuine document. A misattributed report is a genuine report on other material presented as covering this one. A reused report is a genuine report on an old lot presented as current.{{r|usp1503}} | 10 | Four distinct practices are usually grouped under the term. A wholly fabricated report describes work never done. An altered report changes figures on a genuine document. A misattributed report is a genuine report on other material presented as covering this one. A reused report is a genuine report on an old lot presented as current.{{r|usp1503}} |
| 11 | 11 | ||
| + | 12 | The last two are the most common and the hardest to detect, because the document is genuine and will survive any inspection of the document itself. What distinguishes them is the relationship between the document and the material, which is a question about [[Lot traceability|traceability]] rather than about the paper. | |
| + | 13 | ||
| 12 | == Forms and their detectability == | 14 | == Forms and their detectability == |
| 13 | | Form | What is false | Detectable by | | 15 | | Form | What is false | Detectable by | |