Test report forgery: difference between revisions
Diff·revision 13 → 14·02:56, 24 Mar 2025
Difference between revision 13 and revision 14 of Test report forgery. 2 lines changed; the page grew by 123 bytes.
| Revision 13 — 15:00, 5 Mar 2025 EndotoxinEd (talk) add the laboratory accreditation status, or say plainly that it is not stated 4,015 bytes +24 | Revision 14 — 02:56, 24 Mar 2025 Retention_Time_Rae (talk) state that the sample was not drawn blind, so it represents the vial and not the lot 4,138 bytes +123 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 36 | None of these establishes forgery. Each establishes that the document is internally defective, which is a weaker and more defensible statement — and, in practice, a sufficient reason to treat the figures as unusable.{{r|reports}} | 36 | None of these establishes forgery. Each establishes that the document is internally defective, which is a weaker and more defensible statement — and, in practice, a sufficient reason to treat the figures as unusable.{{r|reports}} |
| 37 | 37 | ||
| + | 38 | The absence of such signals establishes nothing at all. A competent fabrication is internally consistent by construction. | |
| + | 39 | ||
| 38 | == References == | 40 | == References == |
| 39 | {{reflist}} | 41 | {{reflist}} |