Research use only: difference between revisions
Diff·revision 26 → 27·13:00, 15 Jul 2025
Difference between revision 26 and revision 27 of Research use only. 2 lines changed; the page grew by 301 bytes.
| Revision 26 — 02:58, 29 Jun 2025 GsCouplingGil (talk) rm the speculation about future scheduling 7,423 bytes ±0 | Revision 27 — 13:00, 15 Jul 2025 StudentSindhu (talk) correct the description of the shortage-list mechanism 7,724 bytes +301 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 49 | First, the label follows the '''seller's''' declared intent, not the buyer's. A jurisdiction that restricts a substance does not stop restricting it because a listing says "research use only", and in several jurisdictions the phrase has been held not to affect the analysis at all.{{r|ruo}} | 49 | First, the label follows the '''seller's''' declared intent, not the buyer's. A jurisdiction that restricts a substance does not stop restricting it because a listing says "research use only", and in several jurisdictions the phrase has been held not to affect the analysis at all.{{r|ruo}} |
| 50 | 50 | ||
| + | 51 | Second, importation of such material for personal use is unlawful or restricted in many jurisdictions, and [[Customs seizure|seizure]] is a documented outcome rather than a theoretical one. Where seizure occurs the ordinary consequence is loss of the consignment; further consequences vary.{{r|ruo}} | |
| + | 52 | ||
| 51 | == References == | 53 | == References == |
| 52 | {{reflist}} | 54 | {{reflist}} |