Good manufacturing practice: difference between revisions

Diff·revision 16 → 17·13:48, 1 Apr 2025

Difference between revision 16 and revision 17 of Good manufacturing practice. 3 lines changed; the page grew by 371 bytes.

Revision 16 — 08:22, 16 Mar 2025 MOTSc_Mira (talk) add the note that a certificate of analysis has no regulatory standing 3,548 bytes ±0	Revision 17 — 13:48, 1 Apr 2025 IsocraticIla (talk) clarify that a business licence is not a manufacturing authorisation 3,919 bytes +371
34	None of these claims is inherently false and none is inherently meaningful. Each becomes checkable with particulars, and the absence of particulars is a property of the claim rather than of the material.{{r\|iso9001}}	34	None of these claims is inherently false and none is inherently meaningful. Each becomes checkable with particulars, and the absence of particulars is a property of the claim rather than of the material.{{r\|iso9001}}
35		35
+		36	The narrower and more common situation is that a certificate names an ISO 9001 certification, which is a genuine and verifiable thing about a management system and says nothing directly about the material in the vial.{{r\|reports}}
+		37
36	== References ==	38	== References ==
37	{{reflist}}	39	{{reflist}}
38	<ref name="ich_q7">International Council for Harmonisation, ''Q7: Good Manufacturing Practice Guide for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients'' (2000).</ref>	40	<ref name="ich_q7">International Council for Harmonisation, ''Q7: Good Manufacturing Practice Guide for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients'' (2000).</ref>
39	<ref name="iso9001">ISO 9001:2015, ''Quality management systems — Requirements''.</ref>	41	<ref name="iso9001">ISO 9001:2015, ''Quality management systems — Requirements''.</ref>
+		42	<ref name="reports">PeptidePedia Wiki community test-report tally, 2024–2026 (self-reported; see [[Project:Sourcing_guidelines]]).</ref>
40		43
41	== See also ==	44	== See also ==