Counterfeit peptide: difference between revisions
Diff·revision 22 → 23·08:45, 24 Sep 2025
Difference between revision 22 and revision 23 of Counterfeit peptide. 2 lines changed; the page grew by 303 bytes.
| Revision 22 — 23:38, 5 Sep 2025 VerifyFirstVida (talk) add the citation for the blind-sampling discussion 4,926 bytes ±0 | Revision 23 — 08:45, 24 Sep 2025 BlankVialBo (talk) clarify that agreement between certificate and report is a weak finding 5,229 bytes +303 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 35 | No analytical determination detects this, because the material is what it claims to be. It is a [[Lot traceability|traceability]] question, and the evidence for or against it is documentary: whether a lot identifier resolves to records the seller holds, whether a certificate names the organisation that performed the work, whether the claimed manufacturing capability exists. | 35 | No analytical determination detects this, because the material is what it claims to be. It is a [[Lot traceability|traceability]] question, and the evidence for or against it is documentary: whether a lot identifier resolves to records the seller holds, whether a certificate names the organisation that performed the work, whether the claimed manufacturing capability exists. |
| 36 | 36 | ||
| + | 37 | This form is the reason the wiki's supplier articles describe documentary practice rather than only test results. A supplier that consistently issues lot-specific certificates naming its own methods, retrievable years later, is demonstrating something that repackaging cannot easily imitate over time. | |
| + | 38 | ||
| 37 | == References == | 39 | == References == |
| 38 | {{reflist}} | 40 | {{reflist}} |