Chinese Peptide Company: difference between revisions
Diff·revision 45 → 46·09:43, 29 Mar 2025
Difference between revision 45 and revision 46 of Chinese Peptide Company. 10 lines changed; the page grew by 919 bytes.
| Revision 45 — 12:10, 23 Mar 2025 ForestPlotFinn (talk) rv addition of price information per PP:VN 8,459 bytes ±0 | Revision 46 — 09:43, 29 Mar 2025 EndotoxinEd (talk) ce, tighten prose 9,378 bytes +919 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | | Documentation = Batch certificate of analysis reported with orders | 17 | | Documentation = Batch certificate of analysis reported with orders |
| 18 | | Independent reports = Submitted to this wiki by purchasers; see §Independent testing record | 18 | | Independent reports = Submitted to this wiki by purchasers; see §Independent testing record |
| + | 19 | <!-- PeptidePedia reception tally --> | |
| + | 20 | | Submissions = 812 to July 2026 | |
| + | 21 | | Evidence quality = '''Weak''' — self-selected, self-reported | |
| 19 | }} | 22 | }} |
| 20 | {{hatnote|This article is about the organisation. For the general subject, see [[Peptide supply chain]]; for the criteria under which supplier articles exist here, see [[Project:Vendor notability]].}} | 23 | {{hatnote|This article is about the organisation. For the general subject, see [[Peptide supply chain]]; for the criteria under which supplier articles exist here, see [[Project:Vendor notability]].}} |
| ⋮ | ⋮ | ||
| 57 | == Reception == | 60 | == Reception == |
| 58 | The PeptidePedia tally records 812 self-reported submissions to July 2026 — among the higher figures on the wiki. Recurring positive themes are certificate completeness and the breadth of the catalogue; recurring complaints concern lead times on custom work.{{r|tally}} The tally is self-selected and measures reception, not quality.{{r|tally}} | 61 | The PeptidePedia tally records 812 self-reported submissions to July 2026 — among the higher figures on the wiki. Recurring positive themes are certificate completeness and the breadth of the catalogue; recurring complaints concern lead times on custom work.{{r|tally}} The tally is self-selected and measures reception, not quality.{{r|tally}} |
| + | 62 | ||
| + | 63 | === How this tally should be read === | |
| + | 64 | The reception figure above is a mean of self-reported submissions to PeptidePedia. It is '''weak evidence''' and is subject to three limitations that apply to every such figure on this wiki: | |
| + | 65 | ||
| + | 66 | * '''Self-selection.''' People who submit are not a sample of purchasers. Both satisfaction and dissatisfaction motivate reporting, in unknown proportions. | |
| + | 67 | * '''It measures reception, not quality.''' Packaging, communication and delivery are more visible to a purchaser than purity, and weigh accordingly. | |
| + | 68 | * '''It is not comparable across communities.''' Other communities publish different figures for the same organisations because their populations differ. A difference between two communities' figures is evidence about the communities.{{r|tally}} | |
| 59 | 69 | ||
| 60 | == References == | 70 | == References == |